National State of the Environment Report - South Africa  
 Main Issues:
Climate
Terrestrial
Water
Marine
Social
Economic
Political
Home page
Logo Home
  This part of the report contains the following sub-sections:
Overview
Introduction
Driving forces
Pressure
State
Impact
Response
Outcome
Linkages
Data issues
Conclusions
References
Indicators
Links


Previous sectionNext section

State of freshwater systems and resources: # 4

The state of freshwater systems and resources is described under the following headings:
Mean Annual Runoff Groundwater pressure Wetlands Estauries
Rivers Dams and interbasin transfers (IBTs) Water quality  

Water quality:  Top of Page
Surface water:  

Three components have been chosen as indicators of water quality for South African surface waters: phosphorus and nitrogen, which are good indicators of the level of domestic pollution in surface waters, and total dissolved solids TDS, which gives an indication of the salinisation or salt content of the water see Box 3.2 Microbial contamination was identified as a good indicator, but little information exists.

Figure 3.17 TDS concentrations

Coverage of data on TDS is extensive. Figure 3.17 indicates that major problem areas, where TDS exceeds 450 mgR-1, are the Western Cape Rivers, the Eastern Cape rivers, northern KwaZulu/Natal and the Vaal River. High TDS levels in the Cape are probably naturally occurring and no cause for alarm.

Coverage for nitrate is also extensive (1995 and 1996 figures). Figure 3.18 indicates that nitrogen pollution is currently at too low concentrations to be a problem in South African surface waters.

Figure 3.17 Total dissolved concentrations
Fig 3.19 Total phosphorus concentrations at sampling points Fig 3.18: Nitrate concentrations
Figure 3.18 Nitrate concentrations

Figure 3.19 shows total phosphorus (TP) for 1985 and 1986, as well as 1995 and 1996. The greater sampling frequency in 1985/86 may be due to the introduction at that time of the 1 mg l-1 phosphorus standard. The number of stations sampled for (TP) has dropped dramatically in the 1990s. Nonetheless, the areas that are sampled seem to have similar characteristics as in 1985/86.

Figure 3.19 Total phosphorus concentrations at sampling points

Most of the major rivers in South Africa have a eutrophication problem because of enrichment (i.e. algal blooms, excessive  macrophyte growth; unpleasant tastes and odours; see Box 3.2.

Fig 3.20a Orange/Vaal river system, showing water quality monitoring points, and longitudinal sections of the Orange River showing water quality (TDS) from the headwaters of the Vaal River to the Orange River Mouth.

Because of the size of the Orange River catchment, conditions along this river may be used as an indicator of water quality for about 50 % of the area of South Africa. A longitudinal section of the river from the headwaters of the Vaal to the Orange River mouth shows the spatial variability of TDS, total phosphorus and nitrate Figure 3.20a-c.

Figure 3.20a Orange/Vaal river system, showing water quality monitoring points, and longitudinal sections of the Orange River showing water quality (TDS) from the headwaters of the Vaal River to the Orange River Mouth.
Fig 3.20b Orange/Vaal river system, showing water quality monitoring points, and longitudinal sections of the Orange River showing water quality (Phosphate) from the headwaters of the Vaal River to the Orange River Mouth. Fig 3.20c Orange/Vaal river system, showing water quality monitoring points, and longitudinal sections of the Orange River showing water quality (Nitrate) from the headwaters of the Vaal River to the Orange River Mouth.
Figure 3.20b Orange/Vaal river system, showing water quality monitoring points, and longitudinal sections of the Orange River showing water quality (Phosphate) from the headwaters of the Vaal River to the Orange River Mouth. Fig 3.20c Orange/Vaal river system, showing water quality monitoring points, and longitudinal sections of the Orange River showing water quality (Nitrate) from the headwaters of the Vaal River to the Orange River Mouth.

A site was chosen on the Vaal River below the Gauteng industrial area as an indicator of temporal variability of the main water quality constituents (Figure 3.21a-f).

Fig 3.21a	Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: Alkalinity Fig 3.21b  Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: NO3
Figure 3.21a Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: Alkalinity Figure 3.21b Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: NO3
Fig 3.21c Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: PO4 Fig 3.21d  Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: SO4
Figure 3.21c Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: PO4 Figure 3.21d Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: SO4
Fig 3.21e  Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: pH Fig 3.21f  Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: Conductivity
Figure 3.21e Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: pH Figure 3.21f Change in water quality with time at Schoemansdrift on the Vaal River: Conductivity
Groundwater:  

Little information is available on the extent of groundwater pollution in South Africa, particularly with regard to microbiological quality. Salinisation is recognised as a threat (Figure 3.22), particularly in the eastern and southern Cape and the dry, western section of the Northern Cape, and the Northern Province. Nitrate risk areas (nitrate concentration >10mgl-1 as Nin >20% of samples) include the Northern Cape, and parts of the Northern Province, while fluoride risk areas (fluoride concentration >1.5mgl-1 as F in >20% of samples) are the western section of the Northern Cape, the Eastern Cape and Mpumalanga.

Fig 3.22  Groundwater quality in South Africa
Figure 3.22 Groundwater quality in South Africa
Box 3.2: Major water quality problems in South Africa

Salinisation

Salinity refers to the total dissolved inorganic compounds in the water and is measured by total dissolved solids (TDS). Contributions to salinity due to human intervention includes: discharge of municipal and industrial effluent; irrigation return water; urban storm-water runoff; surface mobilisation of pollutants from mining and industrial operations and seepage from waste disposal sites, mining and industrial operations. Effects of increased salinity include salinisation of irrigation soils; reduction in crop yields; increased scale formation and corrosion in domestic and industrial water conveyance systems, increased requirement for pre-treatment of selected industrial water uses, and changes in biota.

Enrichment by plant nutrients

 Enrichment by plant nutrients
Enrichment by plant nutrients

The most essential nutrients required by plants are nitrogen and phosphorus in various forms (NO2, NO3, NH4, PO4, orthophosphates). The accumulation of nutrient compounds in excess of natural requirements results in nutrient enrichment eutrophication and may impact on the composition and functioning of the natural aquatic biota. The direct impact is the excessive algal and macrophyte growth leading to impacts on the attractiveness for recreation and sporting activities; the presence of toxic metabolites; the presence of taste- and odour-causing compounds, and difficulty in treating the water for potable and industrial use.

Microbiological quality

Microbiological quality is the presence of disease causing micro-organisms and parasites. Recreational and potable users of water rely on access to safe water. Theirs is a major concern in the national drive to provide reliable and safe sources of water to all. Human settlements and overloaded sewage systems are the major source of deteriorating microbiological water quality. Micro-organisms and parasites may enter the water system in partially-treated sewage effluents, seepage and run-off from inadequate sanitation and waste disposal.

Sedimentation and silt migration

The settlement and silt load carried by streams and rivers typically reflects the natural geophysical and hydrological characteristics of the upstream catchment. Many South African rivers carry a naturally high suspended-solids load. This has been further increased through construction activities; poor agriculture and silviculture practices; over-grazing; destruction of the riparian vegetation, and the physical disturbance of land by industry and urban development (see Terrestrial Ecosystems section). High suspended-solids loads decrease light penetration of water; change natural productivity; affect the natural balance of predators and prey in biotic communities; smother habitats and organisms and change the viability of riverine vegetation. Additionally, high sediment loads are captured in impoundments, reducing their storage capacity.

Acidification

Industrial effluents
Industrial effluents

The pH of natural waters is determined largely by geological and atmospheric influences. Freshwater resources in South Africa are relatively-well buffered. However, human-induced acidification, from industrial effluents, mine drainage and acid precipitation (see Climate and Atmospheric Change section), can cause a lowering of the pH, leading to mobilisation of elements such as iron, aluminium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, mercury, manganese, nickel, lead and zinc. This may impact the biota, as well as mining, domestic, industrial and agricultural users.

Other water quality components

Other water quality components that may become problems in the future, or are localised in extent are: acidity, trace elements, oxygen-consuming compounds and thermal pollution.


Top of Page >     Freshwater: Impacts

There is also information about Freshwater Systems and Resources in the following reports:
Metropolitan reports:
Arrow Cape Metropolitan Council (1998 edition) Arrow Durban Pilot Study
Arrow Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council (1999 edition) Arrow Greater Pretoria Metropolitan Council (1999 edition)

   
Copyright © 1999 Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. All Rights Reserved.
   Site maintained by the Directorate Environmental Information and Reporting
Last update: October 1999