National State of the Environment Report - South Africa  
 Main Issues:
Climate
Terrestrial
Water
Marine
Social
Economic
Political
Home page
Logo Home
  This part of the report contains the following sub-sections:
Overview
Introduction
Driving forces
Pressure
State
Impact
Response
Outcome
Linkages
Data issues
Conclusions
References
Indicators
Links


Previous section Next section

Social Impacts on the Environment: # 1 

The following has an impact on the Social Environment:
Impacts Impacts of Population Growth and Demography Impacts of Social and Economic Development
Crime Use of Biological Resources  

Impacts:  Top of Contents
Overgrazing impacting negatively on the environment
Overgrazing impacting negatively on the environment

Environmentally sustainable development is challenged by population growth and migration and consumption patterns. The pressures created by the dynamics of South Africa's population exacerbate and mutually reinforce the effects of poverty and environmental change. Natural resources are depleted by population pressure and the need for residential land and services. Problems also include overgrazing, depletion of woodlands, deterioration of irrigation systems and overfishing. Specific impacts listed here are in response to the pressures listed in the previous sections.

Impacts of Population Growth and Demography:  Top of Contents

Rapid population growth is very often viewed to be the most important threat to the environment see for exampleEhrlich and Ehrlich, 1990; and Smail, 1997;) as more people means an intensification of the demands made on the finite resources of the earth. However, it is not just the numbers of people, but their consumption patterns, that have an impact on the environment. It has been argued that a baby born in a developed country will use up to 30 times more resources and produce 30 times more waste during its lifetime than a baby in a developing country (McLaren 1993). In South Africa, with its wide gap between rich and poor, extremes of consumption patterns exist which impact on the environment.

Three main areas for concern can be identified as a result of this:

  • Can the limited natural resources of the earth sustain food production for a growing population, given current technological constraints?
  • Can the environment absorb the pollution, and waste produced by modern technology and consumer society?
  • Will the nations of the world be able to collaborate in combatting environmental changes occurring on a global scale, such as global warming, ozone depletion and desertification? (Pebley 1998)

Water usage in South Agrica provides an illustration of these concerns. Although an estimated 4.3 million households still do not have water services, the increase in demand for domestic and industrial water provision over the last four decades has been four times greater than that of the agricultural sector, which is currently still the largest consumer of water. The demand for domestic water is projected to increase from 11% of the total in 1996, to 23% of the total by the year 2030, an increase of more than 200% (Republic of South Africa, 1998). Current projections estimate that serious shortfalls in water provision will occur within the next ten to twenty years. An urgent need for empirical research on the nature and extent of the impact of population growth on specific resources still exists, however. (See Freshwater Systems and Resources)

The significance of migration for the environment is in the changes brought about in the spatial distribution of people. Urban migration may help reduce pressure on the rural environment although it brings a new set of pressures on the urban environment associated with the demand for land and services (Pebley 1998). It has been found, for instance, that urbanisation and particularly unplanned informal settlement negatively impacts runoff from stormwater, concentrating flows and causing land degradation and erosion (Department of Environmental Affairs 1992). Assessing the impact of urbanisation on the environment is complicated, however, as the "ecological footprints" of urban areas may cross even international boundaries. (See Terrestrial Ecosystems).

Uncontrolled settlement places severe stress on service provision. The poor are often forced to settle in areas not suitable for human habitation where they are exposed to industrial hazards and pollution. In environmentally sensitive areas such as coastal zones, uncontrolled settlement may damage environmental integrity (e.g. through overgrazing and pollution), as well as pose severe human health threats (e.g. through contamination of air and water). For example, if no provision for sanitation infrastructure is made in areas with a high water table (typically in coastal areas), surface and groundwater pollution takes place and may lead to the spreading of waterborne diseases such as typhoid fever, diphtheria and cholera. The drought of the early 1990s caused a shortage of surface water, increased dependency on groundwater, and numerous outbreaks of such waterborne diseases. (See Freshwater Systems and Resources).

Impacts of Social & Economic Development:  Top of Contents
Veld Condition: 

Poor people are both agents and victims of environmental change. Most of South Africa’s poor live in rural areas where they lack resources and technology and do not have access to the infrastructure that provides economic opportunities and safeguards health. The urgent short-term needs of the poor prompt them to cultivate erosion-prone hillsides, clear natural vegetation and trees to make space for houses and crops, exploiting the soil without replacing nutrients. In rural areas, the direct impact of poverty on the environment includes the cultivation of marginal lands, the depletion of water resources, the overexploitation of trees and other plants for firewood, medicinal herbs and food (United Nations 1993).

Collecting firewood
Collecting firewood

Fourteen million of the total South African population of 40.58 million people live in the former homelands on soil that is to a large extent unsuitable for farming. According to Huntley, Siegfried & Sunter (1984)both the high population density in the former homelands and the unbalanced distribution of land, rather than farming methods, have contributed to massive soil erosion. An estimated 1.2 million hectares of pasture in marginal areas are viewed to be lost to production because of overgrazing (Department of Environment Affairs 1992). (See also Terrestrial Ecosystems).

Poor households are dependent on fuel burning for energy (Figure 5.16). This has implications for their health and has an impact on the natural environment. Even in urban Gauteng electrified households make extensive use of coal for cooking and heating (Van Horen et al, 1998).

Wood and paraffin are most commonly used in rural areas. About 3 million rural households use fuelwood as primary source of energy, consuming an estimated 7.2 million cubic metres of fuelwood per year (Huntley, Siegfried & Sunter, 1989: 69).

Fig 5.12 Percent of Households Using Different Fuels in Five Rural Areas
Figure 5.12 Percentage of households using different fuels in rural areas.

In addition, many urban households are also dependent on fuelwood. Only an estimated 6 million tons of wood fuel from natural woodlands in communal areas is available annually, in addition to another 4.2 million tons of residues from commercial forestry. It is therefore likely that current biomass extraction rates for energy provision are not sustainable. The removal of trees from the landscape for fuel has implications for the landscape, soil and food production.

The use of coal as the primary energy source by about 950 000 households, particularly on the Highveld and the urban areas of Gauteng, results in specific environmental problems. Indoor burning of coal exposes people to air pollution with serious health impacts and is an important contributing factor to the prevalence of respiratory diseases. Research conducted on air pollution in the Vaal Triangle and the East Rand show that the levels of respirable particulates exceed the 24-hour health standard several times during winter. However, the worst exposures to total suspended particulates occur in coal-burning households in unelectrified and partly electrified urban areas, and wood-burning households in rural areas. These levels of indoor-pollution make total suspended particulates a mortality risk (see Terblanche, 1995).

Providing rural households with electricity would to some extent diminish the direct impact on the environment. The national electrification programme aims at raising the current 60% of households supplied with electricity to 72% by the year 2000, in order to supply an estimated 1.75 million households with electricity (Republic of South Africa, 1998). As 92% of South Africa's electricity is generated from coal, however, the environmental effect will simply be shifted to the electricity power stations in the Mpumalanga Highveld. Together with the Sasol oil from coal production plants, these power stations are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions that, apart from the contribution to global warming, have very negative effects on human health.

Infrastructure: 

A rise in income and standard of living of the poor may lead to increased pressure on the environment in other ways, as it may lead to increased demand for consumer goods. The production of consumer goods not only utilises material directly or indirectly taken from the environment, but the production process itself generates waste and pollutants. Certain consumer goods, such as motor cars and electrical appliances, utilise energy sources that contribute to greenhouse gases. Illustrative of this point is the increase in the number of motor cars on South African roads. Although the overall sales of new cars have dropped in recent years, the number of cars on South Africa's roads has increased (because older cars are not being taken off the roads). More cars on the roads means an increase in fuel emissions into the atmosphere. As the average age of South African motor vehicles is estimated to be around 12 years, the country does not share in the benefits of greater fuel efficiency of new motor vehicles. Table 5.6 shows the steady increase in the sale of fuel over the past five years.

Table 5.6 Fuel sales in millions of litres

FUEL TYPE

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

Petrol

9 629

10 153

10 560

10 785

10 883

Diesel

5 110

5 432

5 759

5 869

5 959

Source:South African Petroleum Industry Association, 1999 Media release

The fact that 80% of all freight in the country is transported by road is an indication that the road network plays a major role in South Africa. The transport of people also mainly occurs by road. The national rail company, Spoornet, has 20 319 km of rail lines available, 16 946 km of which is electrified, as well as an extensive infrastructure. However, although Mainline Passenger Services of Spoornet encourages people to make use of railway transport (such as semi-luxurious trains), the country generally utilizes road transport.

The taxi industry - responsible for high levels of pollution in cities
The taxi industry - providing transport for thousands of commuters

The taxi industry, one of the largest providers of informal employment in the country, presents problems such as pollution, inadequate driving skills contributing to the high number of road accidents and deaths, and competition, which leads to violence and gangsterism. Nevertheless, many township residents continue to prefer taxi transport as taxis are perceived to be faster and more user-friendly than public transport.

The building of new roads and the maintenance of existing roads naturally place great pressure on the environment and can lead to the disturbance of sensitive ecosystems. Emphasis on road transport also depends heavily on petrol, diesel, and oil, and contributes to pollution. Countries in the northern hemisphere have launched initiatives to encourage the use of rail transport. The introduction of compulsory environmental impact studies for new road developments, however, is regarded as an important contribution towards sustainable development.

Top of Page >     Social Environment: Impact..# 2

There is also information about the Social Environment in the following reports:
Metropolitan reports:
Arrow Cape Metropolitan Council (1998 edition) Arrow Durban Pilot Study
Arrow Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council (1999 edition) Arrow Greater Pretoria Metropolitan Council (1999 edition)

   
Copyright © 1999 Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. All Rights Reserved.
   Site maintained by the Directorate Environmental Information and Reporting
Last update: October 1999